CreditCourt Forum 2004 Credit Suit Blog CreditCourt & BayHouse Newsletter BayHouse FAQ Fight Back!!! Forum CreditFactors CreditCourt Forum

TranSouth conspired with Charlie Falk... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

CreditCourt Forum » Links to articles, case law, etc » TranSouth conspired with Charlie Falk's Auto Wholesale, Inc., and JB Collection ... « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christine Baker
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 837
Registered: 08-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 08, 2003 - 07:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Found this case when I called the number for Portfolio Recovery on the CSC credit report and it was answered by TranSouth.

I'd sure like to know what happened with that case!

According to the complaint, TranSouth conspired with Charlie Falk's Auto Wholesale, Inc., and JB Collection Corporation, both of Norfolk, Virginia, to effect an automobile "churning" or revolving repossession scheme. Falk's sold used vehicles at inflated prices, offering to arrange financing at interest rates as high as thirty percent.

Under the terms of the financing contracts, Falk's retained a security interest in the vehicles pending full repayment of the loan by the borrower. Falk's then assigned the secured notes to TranSouth, agreeing to buy back the notes for a fixed price - - usually $1,000 to $1,500 - in the event of the borrower's default.
If a borrower missed a payment, TranSouth had the vehicle repossessed.1 It then mailed a"Notice of Private Sale," giving the borrower an opportunity to redeem the vehicle.2 Any vehicles that were not redeemed were retransferred, with the accompanying notes, to Falk's for the prearranged consideration.

Upon repurchasing the notes, Falk's assigned them to JB, its wholly- owned subsidiary. JB then demanded payment from the borrowers for the "deficiency" between the loan balance and the price obtained by the "sale" of the vehicle, i.e., the retransfer price. If the borrower failed to pay, JB filed a deficiency action in state court for the stated amount. On occasion, JB also claimed attorney fees of twenty-five percent, notwithstanding that it had filed suit without the assistance of counsel.

Add Your Message Here
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration